Kubo Scribe

Capture the case in your template.

Kubo Scribe drafts the consult note in your own templates — ready for review before the patient reaches the front desk.

HIPAA compliant

Recording consult 03:42
Consult note Dr. Okafor's third-molar template
Ready
Chief complaint
History
Exam & findings
Assessment & plan
Consult note Dr. Alvarez's third-molar template
Ready
Chief complaint
History
Exam & findings
P/
Consult note Dr. Chen's third-molar template
Ready
History of present illness
Exam & findings
Assessment & plan
Consult note Dr. Bhatt's third-molar template
Ready
Chief complaint
History
Clinical exam
Radiographic findings
Assessment & plan

Trusted chair-side by

With Kubo, you can write better notes — faster. That means more time for what truly matters. No one goes into healthcare because they love documentation.
Dr. Setter · Periodontist

One encounter, start to signature

The note starts
before you do.

Your assistant takes the history. Kubo is already writing.

Assistant · Consult room

Heard once, written once

Chief complaint, history, medications, allergies — captured as your assistant asks, not retyped after.

Note started

Surgeon · Through the consult

Built for OMS, not adapted

Impactions, nerve proximity, sedation plans — in your templates, in your words.

Drafting live

Dictate onto a template or let it listen. Same note either way.

See a sample note

The note itself

Notes that sound like you,
not a generic template.

Kubo Scribe drafts from the encounter, in your practice's own structure and language.

  • Nothing invented Drafted only from what was said in the visit — never padded with what a typical consult usually contains.
  • In your phrasing Kubo learns how each surgeon writes, not an average of all of them.
  • Structured for surgery Chief complaint through assessment and plan, in your template's order.

Same encounter · each surgeon's own template

Consult note Dr. Okafor's third-molar template
Ready for review
Chief complaint

Referred for evaluation of impacted third molars. Intermittent pain and swelling in the lower-left posterior region over the past three weeks.

History of present illness

28-year-old with recurrent pericoronitis affecting tooth #17 — localized tenderness, limited opening, and food impaction. No fever or lymphadenopathy. Medical history noncontributory; no known drug allergies.

Exam & findings

Partially erupted #17 with an inflamed operculum. Panoramic imaging shows mesioangular impaction of #17 and #32; #17 root apices in proximity to the inferior alveolar canal.

Assessment & plan

Symptomatic impacted third molars (#1, #16, #17, #32). Surgical extraction of all four under IV sedation. Risks — IAN paresthesia, dry socket, bleeding — discussed and consented. Pre-op instructions provided.

Draft · your phrasing
Consult note Dr. Alvarez's third-molar template
Ready for review
Chief complaint

Referred for evaluation of impacted third molars. Intermittent pain and swelling in the lower-left posterior region over the past three weeks.

History of present illness

28-year-old with recurrent pericoronitis affecting tooth #17 — localized tenderness, limited opening, and food impaction. No fever or lymphadenopathy. Medical history noncontributory; no known drug allergies.

Exam & findings

Partially erupted #17 with an inflamed operculum. Panoramic imaging shows mesioangular impaction of #17 and #32; #17 root apices in proximity to the inferior alveolar canal.

P/

Symptomatic impacted 3rd molars (#1, #16, #17, #32). Extraction ×4 under IV sedation. Risks, benefits, and alternatives reviewed in full — IAN paresthesia, dry socket, bleeding, sinus communication. Pt elects to proceed; consent signed. Pre-op instructions given.

Draft · your phrasing
Consult note Dr. Chen's third-molar template
Ready for review
History of present illness

28-year-old referred by their general dentist for evaluation of impacted third molars. Three weeks of intermittent pain and swelling in the lower-left posterior region, with recurrent pericoronitis affecting #17 — localized tenderness, limited opening, and food impaction. No fever or lymphadenopathy. Medical history noncontributory; no known drug allergies.

Exam & findings

Partially erupted #17 with an inflamed operculum. Panoramic imaging shows mesioangular impaction of #17 and #32; #17 root apices in proximity to the inferior alveolar canal.

Assessment & plan

Symptomatic impacted third molars (#1, #16, #17, #32). Surgical extraction of all four under IV sedation. Risks — IAN paresthesia, dry socket, bleeding — discussed and consented. Pre-op instructions provided.

Draft · your phrasing
Consult note Dr. Bhatt's third-molar template
Ready for review
Chief complaint

Referred for evaluation of impacted third molars. Intermittent pain and swelling in the lower-left posterior region over the past three weeks.

History of present illness

28-year-old with recurrent pericoronitis affecting tooth #17 — localized tenderness, limited opening, and food impaction. No fever or lymphadenopathy. Medical history noncontributory; no known drug allergies.

Clinical exam

Partially erupted #17 with an inflamed operculum and localized tenderness on palpation. Maximal opening mildly limited; no trismus, extraoral swelling, or lymphadenopathy.

Radiographic findings

Panoramic imaging shows mesioangular impaction of #17 and #32; #17 root apices in proximity to the inferior alveolar canal. Maxillary sinuses clear, remaining dentition and condyles unremarkable — no other pertinent findings.

Assessment & plan

Symptomatic impacted third molars (#1, #16, #17, #32). Surgical extraction of all four under IV sedation. Risks — IAN paresthesia, dry socket, bleeding — discussed and consented. Pre-op instructions provided.

Draft · your phrasing

Accuracy & sign-off

Accurate enough to sign —
not just fast.

Speed only matters if the note is right. Kubo is built to be exact about what was said in the room, and to hold every draft until a clinician approves it.

Knows the vocabulary

Tooth numbers, nerve anatomy, sedation and anesthetic names — the terms general-purpose transcription mangles come through right, so review is spent reading rather than correcting.

Built for the operatory

Trained for real rooms — suction, handpieces, and more than one person talking — and across accents and 110+ languages. The parts that matter clinically are what it holds onto.

And nothing is final until you say so.

A note stays a draft until the responsible clinician approves it — support staff can prepare and review, but nothing is finalized or filed without sign-off, and every step is on the audit trail.

How sign-off and access work
Consult note
  1. Kubo Drafted the consult note
  2. Assistant Reviewed & prepared
  3. Surgeon Approve to finalize
Approve & finalize
With Kubo, you can write better notes — faster. That means more time for what truly matters. No one goes into healthcare because they love documentation.
Dr. Gupta · Oral Surgeon

Calculate your ROI

See the hours
Scribe hands back.

Documentation is the tax on every visit. Move the sliders to estimate the charting time Kubo Scribe takes off your surgeons' plates each week.

3
12
7 min
4
Charting time reclaimed
67 hrs / week
3,100 hours / year
22 hrs / surgeon / wk
144 notes / week

Estimate assumes Kubo removes ~80% of charting time. Your results depend on note complexity and workflow.

Leave the operatory
with the note done.

With Kubo, the note is written, signed, and filed before you leave the room.